CGEIT - Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT
Senior / ExecutiveOptional
Senior IT governance, advisory and assurance professionals, CIO/CISO-track leaders and board advisers responsible for the governance of enterprise IT.
Overview
Prerequisites
Pass the exam and apply within 5 years. Certification needs 5+ years in an advisory or oversight role supporting the governance of IT; ISACA allows no experience waivers or substitutions. US$50 application fee.
Maintenance
ISACA CPE policy: at least 20 CPE hours every calendar year and 120 CPE hours over a rolling 3-year cycle, plus the annual maintenance fee (US$45 members / US$85 non-members; reduced to US$25/US$50 for a 3rd+ ISACA certification). From 1 January 2027 at least 90 of the 120 hours must align to the certification's exam content outline; up to 30 may be broader professional development.
Resource planning, sourcing strategy, capability and people management.
Week 5
Domain 3 - Benefits realisation
Business cases, value management (Val IT concepts), portfolio/programme management, performance measurement (BSC).
Week 6
Domain 4 - Risk optimisation
ERM integration, risk appetite, IT risk governance, risk reporting to the board.
Week 7
Mixed practice
Timed 150-question mock; review missed items by domain.
Week 8
Review
Re-study Domain 1 (40%); second mock; glossary review.
Exam tips
Read every question for the role you are playing (auditor, risk practitioner, security manager): ISACA rewards the answer that fits that role, not the most technical one.
Watch qualifier words such as FIRST, BEST, MOST, PRIMARY and GREATEST: several options are often true, and only one is the best next step.
There is no penalty for wrong answers, so never leave a question blank.
Budget about 1.5 minutes per question (150 questions in 240 minutes) and flag long scenario items to revisit.
Bring a current, original, government-issued photo ID whose name exactly matches your ISACA profile; arrive 30 minutes early at a PSI centre, or run the PSI system check well before a remote exam.
Answers should reflect the board/executive perspective: direction, evaluation and monitoring, not hands-on management.
Common pitfalls
Treating governance and management as the same thing.
Neglecting benefits realisation (26%) - many candidates over-study risk.
Choosing project-level answers when the question asks about portfolio or enterprise level.